Myers and majluf 1984 pdf Batroun

myers and majluf 1984 pdf

Structure financière et dépenses de R&D Cairn.info 01/07/1984 · See Myers and Majluf 34 for a formal proof. On the other hand, stock retirements should be good news. The news in both cases has no evident necessary connection with shifts in target debt ratios. It may be possible to build a model combining asymmetric information with the costs and benefits of borrowing emphasized in static tradeoff stories

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES DECISIONS WHEN FIRMS HAVE

CAPITAL STRUCTURE PUZZLE by Stewart C. Myers #1548-84. Thus, the form of debt a firm chooses can act as a signal of its need for external finance. History The pecking order theory was first suggested by Donaldson in 1961 and it was modified by Stewart C. Myers and Nicolas Majluf in 1984. It states that companies prioritize their sources of financing (from internal financing to equity) according to, 01/07/1984 · See Myers and Majluf 34 for a formal proof. On the other hand, stock retirements should be good news. The news in both cases has no evident necessary connection with shifts in target debt ratios. It may be possible to build a model combining asymmetric information with the costs and benefits of borrowing emphasized in static tradeoff stories.

Myers, Stewart C. and Majluf, Nicholas S., Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Informationthat Investors Do Not Have (July 1984). NBER Working Paper No. … THE CAPITAL STRUCTURE PUZZLE Stewart C. Myers* This paper's title is intended to remind you of Fischer Black's well-known note on "The Dividend Puzzle," which he closed by saying, "What should the

were three by Stew Myers: (1) a 1977 paper setting out the concept of debt overhang, which became a cornerstone of the “static-tradeoff” theory; (2) a 1984 paper, co-authored with Nicholas Majluf, that laid the foundations of the “pecking order” theory, which continues to be the main rival to the empirical studies by Shyam-Sunder and Myers (1992) and Cai and Ghosh (1995) reject this hypothesis. An apparently competing explanation for the observed fluctuations in the firm's debt ratio is provided by the pecking order theory advanced by Myers (1984a) and …

myers and majluf 1984 pdf Myers.HAVE INFORMATION THAT INVESTORS DO NOT HAVE by. Latest Revision December 1983.The pecking order theory is popularized by Myers and Majluf 1984 when they argue that equity is a less preferred means to raise capital because when. Number of Pages in PDF File: 61. myers e majluf 1984 Some firms with free cash flow use it to build up liquid assets and debt capacity (financial slack). Indeed Myers and Majluf(1984) argue this is what they should do. The Myers-Majluf model (M-M) rests on the high costs of issuing equity caused by the asymmetric information between managers and investors inher- ent in a new equity issue. The M-M

Testing static tradeo⁄ against pecking order models of capital structure1 7Weknowthatinvestment-gradedebtissafe,intheMyers-Majluf(1984)sense,becauseissuingit has, on average, no stock price e⁄ects. See Shyam-Sunder (1991). 8Compare the following discussion with Myers-Majluf (1984, pp. 207—209). 2.2. Asymmetric information and the pecking order The pecking order is one implication of Dans Je cadre de l'asymétrie d'information, Myers et Majluf (1984) ont élargi le champs d'analyse de la théorie du compromis en montrant que la détermination du ratio d'endettement devrait tenir compte d'autres variables telles que le rôle disciplinaire de la

Pecking at Pecking Order Theory: Evidence from Pakistan’s Non-financial Sector Sheikh Jibran, Shakeel Ahmed Wajid, Iqbal Waheed, Tahir Masood Muhammad Abstract This study tests the Pecking Order Theory for the capital structure of listed firms in Pakistan. Thus, the form of debt a firm chooses can act as a signal of its need for external finance. History The pecking order theory was first suggested by Donaldson in 1961 and it was modified by Stewart C. Myers and Nicolas Majluf in 1984. It states that companies prioritize their sources of financing (from internal financing to equity) according to

Thus, the form of debt a firm chooses can act as a signal of its need for external finance. History The pecking order theory was first suggested by Donaldson in 1961 and it was modified by Stewart C. Myers and Nicolas Majluf in 1984. It states that companies prioritize their sources of financing (from internal financing to equity) according to the firm. Myers and Majluf (1984) model the importance of information asymmetry on the equity issue process. A major characteristic of Myers and Majluf model is the importance of the asset structurel As the concept of information asymmetry becomes more and more determinant in the finance

Pecking order theory proposed by Myers (1984) explains that firms most likely pr efer to finance new investments, first with in ternally raised funds i-e; retained earnings, then with debt, and NBER Working Paper #1396 July 1984 Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have ABSTRACT This paper considers a …

1 The Myers and Majluf Underinvestment Problem as Reason for Corporate Risk Aversion Harald Bogner November 6th 2015 harald.bogner@live.de Froot and Stein explain convex costs of external financing following Froot et. al., i.e. with a variant of the Thus, the form of debt a firm chooses can act as a signal of its need for external finance. History The pecking order theory was first suggested by Donaldson in 1961 and it was modified by Stewart C. Myers and Nicolas Majluf in 1984. It states that companies prioritize their sources of financing (from internal financing to equity) according to

(PDF) PECKING ORDER THEORY OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND

myers and majluf 1984 pdf

08 Myers & Majluf 1984.docx Myers Majluf(1984 Topic. 21/05/2007 · Théorie du compromis; La théorie de la signalisation (amorcée par Akerlof en 1970) Le modèle de Ross (le taux d'endettement) Le modèle de Leland …, NBER Working Paper #1396 July 1984 Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have ABSTRACT This paper considers a ….

Myers and majluf 1984 pdf WordPress.com

myers and majluf 1984 pdf

Myers and majluf 1984 pdf WordPress.com. Myers et Majluf [1984] affirment qu’en présence d’asymétrie informationnelle, les investisseurs externes considérant leurs titres risqués, augmentant le coût du financement externe. Ils montrent aussi que lorsque le marché n’arrive pas à distinguer les bonnes Some firms with free cash flow use it to build up liquid assets and debt capacity (financial slack). Indeed Myers and Majluf(1984) argue this is what they should do. The Myers-Majluf model (M-M) rests on the high costs of issuing equity caused by the asymmetric information between managers and investors inher- ent in a new equity issue. The M-M.

myers and majluf 1984 pdf

  • The Contributions of Stewart Myers to the
  • Pecking order as a dynamic leverage theory
  • Managerial Overconfidence Moral Hazard Problems and

  • The Myers and Majluf (1984) model of capital structure choice was the first fully articulated model of the impact of information asymmetry alone on the debt-equity mix. The model elaborates the arguments of Myers (1984), and refines a similar model developed by Miller and Rock (1985), which does not differentiate between debt and equity Pecking at Pecking Order Theory: Evidence from Pakistan’s Non-financial Sector Sheikh Jibran, Shakeel Ahmed Wajid, Iqbal Waheed, Tahir Masood Muhammad Abstract This study tests the Pecking Order Theory for the capital structure of listed firms in Pakistan.

    In Myers and Majluf (1984), the adverse selection effect always dominates. In our generalized model, because of the possible acceptance of bad projects by managers, the pre-announcement stock prices are lower than in Myers and Majluf (1984). This is the main reason for positive announcement View 08 Myers & Majluf 1984.docx from FINANCE Corporate at Copenhagen Business School. Myers & Majluf (1984) Topic and main contribution: Illustrates the importance & consequences of

    21/05/2007 · Théorie du compromis; La théorie de la signalisation (amorcée par Akerlof en 1970) Le modèle de Ross (le taux d'endettement) Le modèle de Leland … Pecking at Pecking Order Theory: Evidence from Pakistan’s Non-financial Sector Sheikh Jibran, Shakeel Ahmed Wajid, Iqbal Waheed, Tahir Masood Muhammad Abstract This study tests the Pecking Order Theory for the capital structure of listed firms in Pakistan.

    Myers, Stewart C. and Majluf, Nicholas S., Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Informationthat Investors Do Not Have (July 1984). NBER Working Paper No. … caractérisant la décision d’investissement (Myers et Majluf [1984]) Florence André-Le Pogamp Chapitre 3 – La structure de financement optimale. Florence André-Le Pogamp L’endettement zLes avantages 9Avantages fiscaux liés à l’endettement 9Pouvoir disciplinaire de l’endettement zLes coûts liés à l’endettement 9Les coûts de faillite 9Les coûts d’agence liés à l

    debt than equity (Myers and Majluf, 1984). That is, firms issue debt first, then possibly hybrid securities such as convertible bonds, then equity as a last resort. Previous studies provide mixed empirical evidence for the two theories. Evidence in fa-vor of the tradeoff theory includes industry effects of optimal ratios, the negative relation The pecking order theory is from Myers (1984) and Myers and Majluf (1984). Since it is well known, we can be brief. Suppose that there are three sources of funding available tofirms: retained earnings,debt,andequity.Retained earnings have no adverse selection problem. Equity is subject to serious adverse selection

    THE CAPITAL STRUCTURE PUZZLE Stewart C. Myers* This paper's title is intended to remind you of Fischer Black's well-known note on "The Dividend Puzzle," which he closed by saying, "What should the Issuance of securities under asymmetric information (Myers/Majluf 1984) 1. Empirical validity of the theorem of irrelevance 2. Model assumptions of the Myers/Majluf approach 3. An underinvestment equilibrium 4. A numerical example 5. The Pecking Order Theory 6. Information costs under different institutional frameworks

    21/05/2007 · Théorie du compromis; La théorie de la signalisation (amorcée par Akerlof en 1970) Le modèle de Ross (le taux d'endettement) Le modèle de Leland … were three by Stew Myers: (1) a 1977 paper setting out the concept of debt overhang, which became a cornerstone of the “static-tradeoff” theory; (2) a 1984 paper, co-authored with Nicholas Majluf, that laid the foundations of the “pecking order” theory, which continues to be the main rival to the

    Myers, Stewart and Nicolas Majluf. “Corporate Financing and In-vestment Decision When Firms Have Information Investors Do Not Have.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 13, No. 2, (July 1984), 187–221. CrossRef Google Scholar Some firms with free cash flow use it to build up liquid assets and debt capacity (financial slack). Indeed Myers and Majluf(1984) argue this is what they should do. The Myers-Majluf model (M-M) rests on the high costs of issuing equity caused by the asymmetric information between managers and investors inher- ent in a new equity issue. The M-M

    Thus, the form of debt a firm chooses can act as a signal of its need for external finance. History The pecking order theory was first suggested by Donaldson in 1961 and it was modified by Stewart C. Myers and Nicolas Majluf in 1984. It states that companies prioritize their sources of financing (from internal financing to equity) according to Pecking at Pecking Order Theory: Evidence from Pakistan’s Non-financial Sector Sheikh Jibran, Shakeel Ahmed Wajid, Iqbal Waheed, Tahir Masood Muhammad Abstract This study tests the Pecking Order Theory for the capital structure of listed firms in Pakistan.

    myers and majluf 1984 pdf

    myers and majluf 1984 pdf Myers.HAVE INFORMATION THAT INVESTORS DO NOT HAVE by. Latest Revision December 1983.The pecking order theory is popularized by Myers and Majluf 1984 when they argue that equity is a less preferred means to raise capital because when. Number of Pages in PDF File: 61. myers e majluf 1984 caractérisant la décision d’investissement (Myers et Majluf [1984]) Florence André-Le Pogamp Chapitre 3 – La structure de financement optimale. Florence André-Le Pogamp L’endettement zLes avantages 9Avantages fiscaux liés à l’endettement 9Pouvoir disciplinaire de l’endettement zLes coûts liés à l’endettement 9Les coûts de faillite 9Les coûts d’agence liés à l

    MAESTRO Pecking Order Theory

    myers and majluf 1984 pdf

    The Capital Structure Puzzle MYERS - 1984 - The Journal. Issuance of securities under asymmetric information (Myers/Majluf 1984) 1. Empirical validity of the theorem of irrelevance 2. Model assumptions of the Myers/Majluf approach 3. An underinvestment equilibrium 4. A numerical example 5. The Pecking Order Theory 6. Information costs under different institutional frameworks, Pecking order theory proposed by Myers (1984) explains that firms most likely pr efer to finance new investments, first with in ternally raised funds i-e; retained earnings, then with debt, and.

    Les déterminants de la structure du capital application

    Structure financière et dépenses de R&D Cairn.info. Pecking order theory is a theory related to capital structure. It was initially suggested by Donaldson. In 1984, Myers and Majluf modified the theory and made it popular.According to this theory, managers follow a hierarchy to choose sources of finance., Some firms with free cash flow use it to build up liquid assets and debt capacity (financial slack). Indeed Myers and Majluf(1984) argue this is what they should do. The Myers-Majluf model (M-M) rests on the high costs of issuing equity caused by the asymmetric information between managers and investors inher- ent in a new equity issue. The M-M.

    The model of Myers and Majluf (1984) focuses on what we refer to as regular offerings of primary shares, instead of rights offerings, shelf-registra-tions, or offerings of secondary shares. As a theoretical extension, Heinkel and Schwartz (1986) and Eckbo and Masulis (1992) model the choice between THE CAPITAL STRUCTURE PUZZLE Stewart C. Myers* This paper's title is intended to remind you of Fischer Black's well-known note on "The Dividend Puzzle," which he closed by saying, "What should the

    Journal of Financial Economics 13 (1984) 187-221. North-Holland CORPORATE FINANCING AND INVESTMENT DECISIONS WHEN FIRMS HAVE INFORMATION THAT INVESTORS DO NOT HAVE* Stewart C. MYERS MIT/NBER, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA Nicholas S. MAJLUF Unioersidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile Received August 1982, final version received February 1984 This (Jalilvand and Harris, 1984). The pecking order theory suggests that firms have a particular preference order for capital used to finance their businesses (Myers and Majluf, 1984). Owing to the information asymmetries between the firm and potential investors, the firm will prefer retained earnings to debt, short-term debt over long-term

    CORPORATE FINANCING AND INVESTMENT DECISIONS WHEN FIRMS HAVE INFORMATION THAT INVESTORS DO NOT HAVE* Stewart C. MYERS MIT/ NBER, Cumhridge, MA 02139, USA Nicholas S. MAJLUF Unioersidud Cutoiicu de Chile. Santiugo, Chile Received August 1982, final … Myers et Majluf, “Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Informations That Investors do not Have”, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 13,1984. Lire également Myers, “The Capital Structura Puzzle”, Journal of Finance, vol. 39, juillet 1984.

    the firm. Myers and Majluf (1984) model the importance of information asymmetry on the equity issue process. A major characteristic of Myers and Majluf model is the importance of the asset structurel As the concept of information asymmetry becomes more and more determinant in the finance View 08 Myers & Majluf 1984.docx from FINANCE Corporate at Copenhagen Business School. Myers & Majluf (1984) Topic and main contribution: Illustrates the importance & consequences of

    caractérisant la décision d’investissement (Myers et Majluf [1984]) Florence André-Le Pogamp Chapitre 3 – La structure de financement optimale. Florence André-Le Pogamp L’endettement zLes avantages 9Avantages fiscaux liés à l’endettement 9Pouvoir disciplinaire de l’endettement zLes coûts liés à l’endettement 9Les coûts de faillite 9Les coûts d’agence liés à l Journal of Financial Economics 13 (1984) 187-221. North-Holland CORPORATE FINANCING AND INVESTMENT DECISIONS WHEN FIRMS HAVE INFORMATION THAT INVESTORS DO NOT HAVE* Stewart C. MYERS MIT/NBER, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA Nicholas S. MAJLUF Unioersidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile Received August 1982, final version received February 1984 This

    21/05/2007 · Théorie du compromis; La théorie de la signalisation (amorcée par Akerlof en 1970) Le modèle de Ross (le taux d'endettement) Le modèle de Leland … Myers et Majluf, “Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Informations That Investors do not Have”, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 13,1984. Lire également Myers, “The Capital Structura Puzzle”, Journal of Finance, vol. 39, juillet 1984.

    Dans Je cadre de l'asymétrie d'information, Myers et Majluf (1984) ont élargi le champs d'analyse de la théorie du compromis en montrant que la détermination du ratio d'endettement devrait tenir compte d'autres variables telles que le rôle disciplinaire de la CORPORATE FINANCING AND INVESTMENT DECISIONS WHEN FIRMS HAVE INFORMATION THAT INVESTORS DO NOT HAVE by Stewart C. Myers Nicholas S. Majluf #1523-84 December 1983

    Myers S.C. et Majluf N.S. (1984). “Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions when Firms Have Information that Investors Do Not Have”, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 13, n°2, pp. 187-221. View Myers and Majluf (1984).docx from ECON 8210002 at University of Southern Denmark, Odense M. Myers and Majluf (1984) How the firms finance them self? In this paper there are considered that the

    1 The Myers and Majluf Underinvestment Problem as Reason for Corporate Risk Aversion Harald Bogner November 6th 2015 harald.bogner@live.de Froot and Stein explain convex costs of external financing following Froot et. al., i.e. with a variant of the Myers, Stewart and Nicolas Majluf. “Corporate Financing and In-vestment Decision When Firms Have Information Investors Do Not Have.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 13, No. 2, (July 1984), 187–221. CrossRef Google Scholar

    Jensen Myers-Majluf free cash flow and the returns to. Testing static tradeo⁄ against pecking order models of capital structure1 7Weknowthatinvestment-gradedebtissafe,intheMyers-Majluf(1984)sense,becauseissuingit has, on average, no stock price e⁄ects. See Shyam-Sunder (1991). 8Compare the following discussion with Myers-Majluf (1984, pp. 207—209). 2.2. Asymmetric information and the pecking order The pecking order is one implication of, Dans Je cadre de l'asymétrie d'information, Myers et Majluf (1984) ont élargi le champs d'analyse de la théorie du compromis en montrant que la détermination du ratio d'endettement devrait tenir compte d'autres variables telles que le rôle disciplinaire de la.

    Testing the Pecking Order Theory and the Signaling Theory

    myers and majluf 1984 pdf

    MAESTRO Pecking Order Theory. Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have InformationThat Investors Do Not Have Stewart C. Myers, Nicholas S. Majluf. NBER Working Paper No. 1396 Issued in July 1984 NBER Program(s):The Monetary Economics Program. This paper considers a firm that must issue common stock to raise cash to undertake a valuable investment, Myers et Majluf, “Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Informations That Investors do not Have”, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 13,1984. Lire également Myers, “The Capital Structura Puzzle”, Journal of Finance, vol. 39, juillet 1984..

    Myers and Majluf (1984).docx Myers and Majluf(1984 How

    myers and majluf 1984 pdf

    CAPITAL STRUCTURE PUZZLE by Stewart C. Myers #1548-84. maintenir [Myers (1984)]. La principale théorie alternative d’explication de la structure du capital, la théorie du finance-ment hiérarchisé [Myers (1984) et Myers et Majluf (1984)], s’appuie sur l’existence d’asymétries informationnelles. Ces asymétries informationnelles engendrent des … Myers, Stewart and Nicolas Majluf. “Corporate Financing and In-vestment Decision When Firms Have Information Investors Do Not Have.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 13, No. 2, (July 1984), 187–221. CrossRef Google Scholar.

    myers and majluf 1984 pdf

  • Théorie financière et stratégie financière Cairn.info
  • Tests of the Pecking Order Theory and the Tradeoff Theory

  • Journal of Financial Economics 13 (1984) 187-221. North-Holland CORPORATE FINANCING AND INVESTMENT DECISIONS WHEN FIRMS HAVE INFORMATION THAT INVESTORS DO NOT HAVE* Stewart C. MYERS MIT/NBER, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA Nicholas S. MAJLUF Unioersidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile Received August 1982, final version received February 1984 This PDF Numerous empirical studies in finance have tested many theories for firms' capital structure. The pecking order theory of capital structure is among the most influential theories of firms

    Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Stewart C. Myers and Nicholas S. Majluf. Journal of Financial Economics, 1984, vol. 13, issue 2, 187-221 Pecking order theory yang dikemukakan oleh Myers dan Majluf (1984) menggunakan dasar pemikiran bahwa tidak ada suatu target debt to equity ratio tertentu dan tentang hirarkhi sumber dana yang paling disukai oleh perusahaan. Esensi teori ini adalah adanya …

    profitability and debt is positively related (Myers, 1984; Myers and Majluf, 1984). Shyam-Sunder and Myers (1999) examine that which model is the most useful and fitted for the corporate financing behaviour in the context of U.S firms. Their sample consists of 157 firms, data ranges from 1971 to 1989. Empirical results are given by extensive asymmetries in a rational framework (eg Leland and Pyle 1977, Ross 1977, Myers and Majluf 1984). Another strand of research examines the use of capital structure to mitigate agency problems (Jensen and Meckling 1976, Grossman and Hart 1982, Jensen 1986, Dewatripont and Tirole 1991, Fairchild 2003). This approach assumes a

    Myers, Stewart and Nicolas Majluf. “Corporate Financing and In-vestment Decision When Firms Have Information Investors Do Not Have.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 13, No. 2, (July 1984), 187–221. CrossRef Google Scholar Issuance of securities under asymmetric information (Myers/Majluf 1984) 1. Empirical validity of the theorem of irrelevance 2. Model assumptions of the Myers/Majluf approach 3. An underinvestment equilibrium 4. A numerical example 5. The Pecking Order Theory 6. Information costs under different institutional frameworks

    Journal of Financial Economics 13 (1984) 187-221. North-Holland CORPORATE FINANCING AND INVESTMENT DECISIONS WHEN FIRMS HAVE INFORMATION THAT INVESTORS DO NOT HAVE* Stewart C. MYERS MIT/NBER, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA Nicholas S. MAJLUF Unioersidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile Received August 1982, final version received February 1984 This 2.2 Pecking order theory The pecking order theory developedby Myers (1984) is analter native capital structure theory. According tothe pecking order theory,a firm’s capital struc ture is drivenby the firm’s preference tofinance withinternally generatedfunds instead of …

    The model of Myers and Majluf (1984) focuses on what we refer to as regular offerings of primary shares, instead of rights offerings, shelf-registra-tions, or offerings of secondary shares. As a theoretical extension, Heinkel and Schwartz (1986) and Eckbo and Masulis (1992) model the choice between Myers, Stewart C. and Majluf, Nicholas S., Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Informationthat Investors Do Not Have (July 1984). NBER Working Paper No. …

    CORPORATE FINANCING AND INVESTMENT DECISIONS WHEN FIRMS HAVE INFORMATION THAT INVESTORS DO NOT HAVE by Stewart C. Myers Nicholas S. Majluf #1523-84 December 1983 Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Stewart C. Myers and Nicholas S. Majluf. Journal of Financial Economics, 1984, vol. 13, issue 2, 187-221

    In Myers and Majluf (1984), the adverse selection effect always dominates. In our generalized model, because of the possible acceptance of bad projects by managers, the pre-announcement stock prices are lower than in Myers and Majluf (1984). This is the main reason for positive announcement Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have InformationThat Investors Do Not Have Stewart C. Myers, Nicholas S. Majluf. NBER Working Paper No. 1396 Issued in July 1984 NBER Program(s):The Monetary Economics Program. This paper considers a firm that must issue common stock to raise cash to undertake a valuable investment

    Thus, the form of debt a firm chooses can act as a signal of its need for external finance. History The pecking order theory was first suggested by Donaldson in 1961 and it was modified by Stewart C. Myers and Nicolas Majluf in 1984. It states that companies prioritize their sources of financing (from internal financing to equity) according to Some firms with free cash flow use it to build up liquid assets and debt capacity (financial slack). Indeed Myers and Majluf(1984) argue this is what they should do. The Myers-Majluf model (M-M) rests on the high costs of issuing equity caused by the asymmetric information between managers and investors inher- ent in a new equity issue. The M-M

    Myers et Majluf, “Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Informations That Investors do not Have”, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 13,1984. Lire également Myers, “The Capital Structura Puzzle”, Journal of Finance, vol. 39, juillet 1984. Journal of Financial Economics 13 (1984) 187-221. North-Holland CORPORATE FINANCING AND INVESTMENT DECISIONS WHEN FIRMS HAVE INFORMATION THAT INVESTORS DO NOT HAVE* Stewart C. MYERS MIT/NBER, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA Nicholas S. MAJLUF Unioersidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile Received August 1982, final version received February 1984 This

    L’hypothèse traditionnelle de la théorie du financement hiérarchique (Myers, 1984 ; Myers et Majluf, 1984), suggère que, si le coût de la sélection adverse2 est plus faible à certains moments, l’entreprise devrait profiter de cette opportunité pour placer ses titres. Des concentrations des émissions d’actions durant ces périodes maintenir [Myers (1984)]. La principale théorie alternative d’explication de la structure du capital, la théorie du finance-ment hiérarchisé [Myers (1984) et Myers et Majluf (1984)], s’appuie sur l’existence d’asymétries informationnelles. Ces asymétries informationnelles engendrent des …